Predictive Process Optimization

Process Digital Twins

Simulate, predict, and optimize lab processes before a single sample runs. Process digital twins compound from governed data, scientific context, and predictive models — delivering model-guided optimization with full traceability.

Industry Readiness — Digital Twin Adoption
17% of pharma labs investing in digital twins (Pistoia Alliance, 2024)
11% have reached a fully predictive state (Deloitte, 2024)
faster process optimization with model-guided experiments (McKinsey, 2024)
The Bottleneck

Process Optimization Without Prediction

Pharma process development relies on physical experimentation — running every parameter combination on real instruments with real materials. Without computational models, optimization is slow, expensive, and constrained by lab capacity.

Trial-and-Error Optimization

Each process parameter change requires a physical run. Design of Experiments (DOE) matrices grow exponentially, consuming weeks of instrument time and expensive reagents.

DOE matrices for multi-factor processes require dozens to hundreds of physical runs — each consuming instrument time and materials

Scale-Up Blind Spots

Processes optimized at bench scale behave differently at pilot and manufacturing scale. Without predictive models, scale-up failures are discovered late — after materials and time are committed.

Scale-dependent parameter sensitivity is invisible without predictive models until pilot commitment

Disconnected Process Knowledge

Method development data lives in Electronic Laboratory Notebooks (ELNs), Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS), batch records, and analyst notebooks. Cross-campaign process understanding stays locked in individual scientists' expertise.

Process knowledge fragments across systems and scientists — no unified dataset for model training

No Feedback Loop

Results from previous campaigns rarely inform future experiments systematically. Each project restarts optimization from scratch instead of compounding on historical data.

Each new project restarts from zero — no systematic reuse of prior campaign learnings
The ZONTAL Approach

Governed Models on Governed Data

Process digital twins compound from four principles. Governed instrument data feeds scientific context, which trains predictive models that guide supervised process optimization — all on traceable, auditable infrastructure.

1

Foundation: Governed Process Data

Integration Factories deliver validated, traceable data from every instrument and system involved in the process. Parameters, conditions, and results flow into the scientific context graph automatically. Adapters include simulation mode, so the full data pipeline for all process instruments can be built and verified in parallel — without waiting for hardware access on each instrument queue.

2

Context: Cross-Campaign Lineage

The scientific context model links process parameters, analytical results, material properties, and environmental conditions across campaigns, sites, and scales — creating the training dataset digital twins need.

3

Intelligence: Predictive Process Models

Scientific Intelligence builds and validates predictive models on governed historical data. Multivariate analysis and mechanistic models identify parameter-outcome relationships across the entire process space.

4

Decisions: Model-Guided Optimization

AI-assisted workflows propose optimized parameter sets, simulate expected outcomes, and route recommendations through configurable approval gates. You set the oversight level — the platform executes.

Measurable Impact

Predictive Precision, Governed Execution

Process digital twins reduce physical experimentation while improving outcomes — every prediction traceable to source data, every model decision auditable.

60–80%
Fewer Physical Experiments
Model-guided parameter selection reduces the number of physical runs needed to reach optimized conditions (McKinsey, 2024)
Faster Process Optimization
Simulate parameter spaces computationally instead of running every combination physically (McKinsey, 2024)
100%
Model Decision Traceability
Every model prediction, parameter recommendation, and approval gate recorded in the governed audit trail — a 21 CFR Part 11 requirement for GxP model use (FDA, 2024)
Same day
Scale-Up Risk Assessment
Predictive models flag scale-dependent parameter sensitivity before pilot commitment — traditional assessments take 2–6 weeks (ICH Q8–Q12 implementation analysis, EMA, 2023)
Compound Effect

Principles Compounding to Digital Twins

Process digital twins are the compounding reward of four principles working together. No principle can be skipped — each provides essential capability for the next.

Digital twin fidelity depends on governed, contextualized data flowing through all principles.
Evaluate readiness with the five-question framework →

Integrate

Integration Industrialization

Data Hub connects 150+ vendors and 400+ instrument models through governed Integration Factories. Every data point is validated and traced from source instrument to scientific context with full provenance. Governed instrument connectors deliver validated process data — reaction parameters, analytical measurements, environmental conditions — from every development instrument.

  • 150+ vendor instruments supported
  • 400+ instrument models connected
  • 8 core techniques · 80+ variants
  • Real-time process parameter capture from development instruments
Contextualize

Scientific Context & Lineage

Digital Lab and Platform Modules build the scientific context graph — ontology mapping, cross-system identity reconciliation, and full lineage from instrument through result to insight. The context graph links process parameters to outcomes across campaigns, scales, and sites. Every data point carries full lineage from raw measurement to model training input.

  • Ontology mapping across all data domains
  • Cross-system identity reconciliation
  • Full lineage graph: instrument → method → sample → result
  • Parameter → outcome lineage across campaigns and scales
Analyze

Scientific Intelligence

Cross-program analytics surfaces trends, anomalies, and predictive signals that manual review misses — proven AI capabilities running on governed, validated scientific data. Predictive models trained on governed historical data — multivariate analysis, mechanistic models, and machine learning — reveal parameter-outcome relationships.

  • Cross-program trend detection and comparison
  • Anomaly detection and signal identification
  • Predictive modeling on governed data
  • Parameter sensitivity analysis and cross-campaign pattern detection
Decide

AI-Enabled Decisions

AI-assisted workflows consume governed data, scientific context, and intelligence to generate actionable outputs — with configurable oversight from full autonomy to human-in-the-loop approval gates. Model-guided workflows recommend optimized parameters, simulate expected outcomes, and route decisions through configurable approval gates — from human-supervised to fully autonomous.

  • Guided workflow orchestration
  • Configurable oversight — from approval gates to full autonomy
  • Role-based views and reporting
  • Model-recommended parameter sets with supervised optimization workflows

Trusted by 6 of the 10 largest pharmaceutical companies in the world

And leading biotechs and agrochemical companies

Start With Your Data

Build the Foundation for Process Digital Twins

Digital twins require governed data, scientific context, and validated models across all principles. Start building the infrastructure today so your data is ready.